Lewis, C., Obregon-Tito, A., Tito, R., Foster, M. & Spicer, P. The Human Microbiome Undertaking: classes from human genomics. Tendencies Microbiol. 20, 1–4 (2012).
Claw, Ok. et al. A framework for enhancing moral genomic analysis with Indigenous communities. Nat. Commun. 9, 2957 (2018).
Reardon, J. Race to the End (Princeton College Press, 2009).
Tsosie, Ok., Yracheta, J., Kolopenuk, J. & Smith, R. Indigenous information sovereignties and information sharing in organic anthropology. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 174, 183–186 (2021).
Tsosie, Ok., Yracheta, J., Kolopenuk, J. & Geary, J. We now have ‘gifted’ sufficient: Indigenous genomic information sovereignty in precision drugs. Am. J. Bioeth. 21, 72–75 (2021).
Haring, R. C. et al. Empowering equitable information use partnerships and Indigenous information sovereignties mid pandemic genomics. Entrance. Public Well being 9, 742467 (2021).
Asad, T. in The Politics of Anthropology: from Colonialism and Sexism Towards a View from Beneath (eds Huizer, G. & Mannheim, B.) 85–96 (Ithica Press, 1973).
Deloria, V. Custer Died for Your Sins: an Indian Manifesto (College of Oklahoma Press, 1969).
Hymes, D. Reinventing Anthropology (Pantheon, 1974).
Trouillot, M. R. World Transformations (Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).
Broesch, T. et al. Navigating cross-cultural analysis: methodological and moral issues. Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1245 (2020).
Urassa, M., Lawson, D., Wamoyi, J., Gurmu, E. & Gibson, M. Cross-cultural analysis should prioritize equitable collaboration. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 668–671 (2021).
Blanchard, J. et al. Energy sharing, capability constructing, and evolving roles in ELSI: The Middle for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Analysis. Collaborations 3, 18 (2020).
Hudson, M. et al. in Ethics in Indigenous Analysis, Previous Experiences—Future Challenges (Vaartoe Centre for Sami Analysis, 2016).
Schroeder, D., Chatfield, Ok., Singh, M., Chennells, R. & Herissone-Kelly, P. Equitable Analysis Partnerships: a World Code of Conduct to Counter Ethics Dumping (Springer Nature, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15745-6
Jobson, R. The case for letting anthropology burn: sociocultural anthropology in 2019. Am. Anthropologist 122, 259–271 (2020).
Kowal, E. Orphan DNA: Indigenous samples, moral biovalue and postcolonial science. Soc. Stud. Sci. 43, 577–597 (2013).
Smith, L. T. Decolonizing Methodologies: Analysis and Indigenous Peoples (Bloomsbury Publishing, 2021).
Viswanathan, M. et al. Neighborhood‐Based mostly Participatory Analysis: Assessing the Proof: Abstract (AHRQ, 2004).
Caniglia, G. et al. A pluralistic and built-in strategy to action-oriented information for sustainability. Nat. Maintain. 4, 93–100 (2021).
Coombes, B., Johnson, J. & Howitt, R. Indigenous geographies III: methodological innovation and the unsettling of participatory analysis. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38, 845–854 (2014).
Sharp, R. & Foster, M. Neighborhood involvement within the moral assessment of genetic analysis: classes from American Indian and Alaska Native populations. Environ. Well being Perspect. 110, 145–148 (2002).
Wallerstein, N. & Duran, B. in Neighborhood-Based mostly Participatory Analysis for Well being: Advancing Social and Well being Fairness (eds Wallerstein, N., Duran, B., Oetzel, J. G. & Minkler, M.) 17–29 (John Wiley and Sons, 2017).
Obregon-Tito, A. et al. Subsistence methods in conventional societies distinguish intestine microbiomes. Nat. Commun. 6, 6505 (2015).
Mandava, A., Tempo, C., Campbell, B., Emanuel, E. & Grady, C. The standard of knowledgeable consent: mapping the panorama. A assessment of empirical information from creating and developed nations. J. Med. Ethics 38, 356–365 (2012).
Afolabi, M. O. et al. Knowledgeable consent comprehension in African analysis settings. Tropical Med. Int. Well being 19, 625–642 (2014).
Edwards, T., Cadigan, R., Evans, J. & Henderson, G. Biobanks containing scientific specimens: defining traits, insurance policies, and practices. Clin. Biochem. 47, 245–251 (2014).
Grady, C. et al. Broad consent for analysis with organic samples: workshop conclusions. Am. J. Bioeth. 15, 34–42 (2015).
Lewis, C., McCall, L.-I., Sharp, R. & Spicer, P. Moral precedence of essentially the most actionable system of biomolecules: the metabolome. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 171, 177–181 (2020).
McCarty, C., Chapman-Stone, D., Derfus, T., Giampietro, P. & Fost, N. Neighborhood session and communication for a population-based DNA biobank: the Marshfield clinic personalised drugs analysis challenge. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 146A, 3026–3033 (2008).
Tsosie, Ok. S., Yracheta, J. M. & Dickenson, D. Overvaluing particular person consent ignores dangers to tribal individuals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 20, 497–498 (2019).
Chavis, D. M., Stucky, P. E. & Wandersman, A. Returning fundamental analysis to the neighborhood: a relationship between scientist and citizen. Am. Psychologist 38, 424 (1983).
Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Byron, E., Leonard, W. & Vadez, V. The impact of market economies on the well-being of indigenous peoples and on their use of renewable pure sources. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 34, 121–138 (2005).
Reardon, J. & TallBear, Ok. ‘Your DNA is our historical past’ genomics, anthropology, and the development of whiteness as property. Curr. Anthropol. 53, 233–245 (2012).
Schnorr, S. et al. Intestine microbiome of the Hadza hunter-gatherers. Nat. Commun. 5, 3654 (2014).
O’Doherty, Ok. C. et al. Opinion: conservation and stewardship of the human microbiome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14312–14313 (2014).
Dubois, G., Girard, C., Lapointe, F.-J. & Shapiro, J. The Inuit intestine microbiome is dynamic over time and formed by conventional meals. Microbiome 5, 151 (2017).
Sprockett, D. et al. Microbiota meeting, construction, and dynamics amongst Tsimane horticulturalists of the Bolivian Amazon. Nat. Commun. 11, 3772 (2020).
Stagaman, Ok. et al. Market integration predicts human intestine microbiome attributes throughout a gradient of financial improvement. MSystems 3, 00122-17 (2018).
Conteville, L. C., Oliveira-Ferreira, J. & Vicente, A. C. P. Intestine microbiome biomarkers and practical variety inside an Amazonian semi-nomadic hunter-gatherer group. Entrance. Microbiol. 30, 1743 (2019).
Fischer, M. Within the science zone: the Yanomami and the combat for illustration. Anthropol. In the present day 17, 9–14 (2001).
Goncalves Martin, J. Opening a path with papers: Yanomami well being brokers and their use of medical paperwork. J. Lat. Am. Caribb. Anthropol. 21, 434–456 (2016).
Redford, Ok. & Maclean Stearman, A. Forest-dwelling native Amazonians and the conservation of biodiversity: pursuits in widespread or in collision? Conserv. Biol. 7, 248–255 (1993).
Vega, C., Orellana, J., Oliveira, M., Hacon, S. & Basta, P. Human mercury publicity in Yanomami indigenous villages from the Brazilian Amazon. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Well being 15, 1051 (2018).
Clemente, J. et al. The microbiome of uncontacted Amerindians. Sci. Adv. 1, 1500183 (2015).
Gibbons, A. Hadza on the brink. Science 360, 700–704 (2018).
Pollom, T. R., Herlosky, Ok. N., Mabulla, I. A. & Crittenden, A. N. Adjustments in juvenile foraging habits among the many Hadza of Tanzania throughout early transition to a mixed-subsistence financial system. Hum. Nat. 31, 123–140 (2020).
Crittenden, A. N. et al. Hurt avoidance and mobility throughout center childhood and adolescence amongst Hadza foragers. Hum. Nat. 32, 150–176 (2021).
Wynberg, R. & Chennells, R. in Indigenous Peoples, Consent and Profit Sharing (eds Wynberg, R., Schroeder, D. & Chennells, R.) 89–124 (Springer, 2009); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3123-5_6
Rubel, M. et al. Life-style and the presence of helminths is related to intestine microbiome composition in Cameroonians. Genome Biol. 21, 122 (2020).
Sankaranarayanan, Ok. et al. Intestine microbiome variety amongst Cheyenne and Arapaho people from Western Oklahoma. Curr. Biol. 25, 3161–3169 (2015).
Rogers, G. B., Ward, J., Brown, A. & Wesselingh, S. L. Inclusivity and fairness in human microbiome analysis. Lancet 39, 728–729 (2019).
Ambler, J. et al. Together with digital sequence information within the Nagoya Protocol can promote information sharing. Tendencies Biotechnol. 39, 116–125 (2021).
Morgera, E. The necessity for a world authorized idea of honest and equitable profit sharing. Eur. J. Int. Regulation 27, 353–383 (2016).
Bissell, W. Partaking colonial nostalgia. Cultural Anthropol. 20, 215–248 (2005).
Crittenden, A. in The Secret Lives of Anthropologists (ed. Hewlett, B. L.) 299–321 (Routledge, 2019).
Redford, Ok. H. The ecologically noble savage. Cultural Survival Q 15, 46–48 (1991).
Carmody, R. N., Sarkar, A. & Reese, A. T. Intestine microbiota by way of an evolutionary lens. Science 372, 462–463 (2021).
Belmont Report: Moral Rules and Tips for the Safety of Human Topics of Analysis (Nationwide Fee for the Safety of Human Topics of Biomedical and Behavioral Analysis, 1979).
McClain, V. W. Patents on life: a short view of human milk element patenting. World Nutr. 9, 57–69 (2018).
Hill, J. H. ‘Knowledgeable rhetorics’ in advocacy for endangered languages: who’s listening, and what do they hear? J. Linguistic Anthropol. 12, 119–133 (2002).